For shooters and re-enactors, living history demonstrators, air soft players etc. Membership benefits include

the Shooters' Journal, advice line and £10 million VCR compliant PLI as standard for all activities 



What a Troll

Posted on October 16, 2017 at 2:25 PM

Just a Troll On Saturday 7th October a ‘video’ got posted on the Airsoft Nation’s Facebook page in which the SRA rated a defamatory mention. What sparked things off was the launch of a new airsoft association – UKASA – United Kingdom Airsoft Site Association, which the ‘video’ author felt the irrational need to sneer at. The main source of airsoft product appears to be Taiwan. Quality, build, feel and utility have improved immensely in the past two decades since the SRA included ‘airsoft skirmish’ in their public liability insurance policy. Their usage has also broadened: classified these days as ‘Realistic Imitation Firearms’ (RIFs) by the Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006, they are photogenic enough to serve as wall hangers, set decorators, collectors’ items and in living history displays: as projectile launchers in battle re-enactment and in target shooting they feature in both the gallery-style shooting shy one might encounter at a country fair and at target shooting clubs: besides that, they get used by war-gamers in airsoft skirmish and by movie-makers as props. Home Office concerns about the public owning firearms have a long back-story, consisting largely of a series of ignorance-based knee-jerk reactions to unrelated events. Back in the 1960s, the Wilson government repealed the 1870 Gun Licensing Act, that being a tax costing more to collect than it raised. Gun owners were supposed to buy one unless they had a firearm certificate or a game licence: so clay pigeon shooters needed it and air gun owners were supposed to acquire them after Moore v Gooderham (1960) decided that low-powered air guns were firearms and not toys, as earlier held in Bryson v Gamage Ltd (1907) In the course of making that decision, plans were drawn up to introduce a shot gun certificate, that they then shelved as not worth the bother, in 1965. On 12th August 1966 three Metropolitan policemen were shot dead and the media hue and cry was for the restoration of the death penalty: suspended for an experimental five-year period the year before. The names of the murderers who escaped the rope because of that temporary (later permanent) reprieve became famous: Ronald and Reginald Kray, Myra Hindley, Ian Brady and Harry Roberts. Had they hanged, they would be as nameless and faceless as the last two men hanged in Britain in 1964. Home Secretary of the day Roy Jenkins headed off the media storm by cracking down on shotguns: the usual knee-jerk diversionary tactic that this saga will encounter again and again. The police murderers had used handguns; shotguns only featured in poaching cases, domestic homicides and suicides, and as swag in burglaries, but on the ‘do something’ mantra that politicians live day-to-day by, it was handily still near the top of the litter bin. And that would have been that, except the Home Office gave the job of issuing the certificates to the police, instead of to the Post Office that had previously issued gun licenses. Some 600,000 people applied in 1968, causing another knee-jerk reaction: this time by (Sir) John McKay, chief inspector of constabularies. He went into a frightful funk at the thought of so many people, particularly in cities, having guns, little realizing that only one in four (SRA’s estimate) of owners actually bothered applying. The police didn’t know the extent of gun ownership in the UK because it wasn’t a problem and thus wasn’t on their radar. Nevertheless, the urge to ‘do something’ was all powerful, so McKay formed a committee of his cronies and they concluded that reducing the number of firearms in the hands of the public was a desirable aim in itself. So a committee without a question to answer reached its conclusions first and then looked for ‘how’ to achieve their goal rather than letting the evidence show them the way forwards. McKay’s report was so embarrassing that it has never been published. It formed the background to a green paper in 1973 that was flushed into oblivion, along with Sir Edward Heath’s conservative government in 1974, only to re-appear as the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1988. Another knee-jerk reaction to events: in this instance the issue of a firearm certificate to an unsuitable person by a police force just going through the motions. This legislation banned semi-automatic centre-fire rifles and legitimized deactivation, thus setting the scene for subsequent knee-jerk reactions. The Home Office didn’t notice, of course. They’d swallowed the police line that reducing the number of certificates was the solution whatever the problem was thought to be and banning some guns by type should supposedly have a reducing impact on certificate numbers. The ‘increase’ in shot gun certificate numbers 1968-88 certainly reflects the increasing wealth and leisure time of the population, but was also undoubtedly driven by late take-up of the requirement by owners. It took the farming community a long time to ‘get’ that the requirement was one each (like birth certificates) as opposed to one per farm, as was the case with poisons, explosives and other such licenses as may be necessary for a working farm to work. After 1988, numbers dwindled, but that’s carborundum policing rather than the public changing its attitudes. The main effect was far more guns outside the control system than within it. Deactivation took tens of thousands of guns out of registration and since demand could not be satisfied within the licensing system, people looked to guns that didn’t have anything to do with licensing instead. Entries to the market included paintball guns, airsoft and air cartridge revolvers. The handgun ban in 1997, while putting ‘real’ handguns into the prohibited section 5 category, also released from the controls altogether captive bolt humane killers and CO2 pneumatic guns. Policy drew the bottom line power threshold far enough above paintball and airsoft for them not to get onto the Home Office radar. We’ve come a long way since the US Government decided that 59 foot pounds was the minimum for lethality. In the UK today it’s 0.7 ft. lb. In January 2003 a drive-by shooting killed two women in a burst of machine gun fire. Machine guns were prohibited in 1937, so naturally some other scapegoat had to be prohibited in the ‘knee-jerk’ ‘do-something’ world of the Home Office. Air cartridge revolvers got it that time around and three years later, airsoft came to Home Office attention. The Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006 refers to ‘realistic imitation firearms’ (RIFs) while specifically excluding deactivated formerly real guns from the definition. There had previously been public order legislation relating to imitation firearms, but the ‘problem’ was the open sale of RIFs to walk-in custom. A 1994 research paper at the Home Office had found, inter alia, that the armed robbers they interviewed in prison had often made the decision to stage a hold-up because a suitable firearms-look-a-like prop came to hand. Only two of the robbers in that study had real guns and one of them had owned his since the war and had no ammunition. All the others used imitations of one sort or another – this is the old sawn-off cucumber in a brown paper bag trick – or variations of it, and many of them didn’t show a weapon to the victims at all. So the idea was a variation on the US federal five-day waiting period for a handgun. Instead of walk-in impulse buyers being able to make a purchase and then rob next door with it, the Home Office wanted a qualifying threshold that was more than an age bar but short of a licensing system. Airsoft guns were, by then, a specialist subject: ‘real’ gunshops didn’t generally sell them. Air weapon specialist gunshops might have: the only one we were familiar with at the time didn’t and these air gun shops had to register as firearms dealers with the police and keep a register of who they sold air guns to as a result of the VCR Act. The Act lumped airsofts in with any other RIFs – replicas, 1/1 model kits etc. Regulations following the Act in 2007 suggested that public liability insurance would serve as evidence one had a defence under the Act in relation to historic re-enactments. So far as the airsoft side goes, the importers formed UKARA – the United Kingdom Airsoft Retailers Association. Under the Act, airsoft retailers need a defence to a charge of supply. In the case of historical re-enactment, that’s straightforward – the buyer produces evidence of his public liability insurance for that purpose, completes the deal and goes on his way rejoicing. But for airsoft skirmishers, the solution arrived at was registration of players. You attend a game site three times in seven weeks and the organisers register you with UKARA. Then when you turn up at a retailer, he has a defence under the Act for making a sale to you. What you’ve got as you go on your way with your purchase is a realistic imitation firearm in a public place. That has its own problems, all of which are solved by keeping what it is concealed by packaging that also prevents you having access to it in public: ‘securely covered so that it cannot be fired’ as the mantra relating to air guns puts it. There’s no offence of possession per se; the VCR Act and regulations are concerned only with transactions and that sales are limited to authorized buyers. These are persons with PLI for historic re-enactment. The Act and regulations are silent about UKARA registration, as is the Home Office website. As an aside, ‘Airsoft World’ exhibited at ‘War and Peace’ this year and when we trawled through their range of products they couldn’t produce anything that didn’t homage weapons used in past conflicts: so all airsoft skirmish is ‘historic’: sure, you can stage a futuristic scenario for a war game, such as Russians v Germany, but you’ll be doing it with weapons that all served in Afghanistan. So, back to our troll, rambling into an open microphone in a darkened bedroom somewhere in England: his problem seemed to be that joining UKASA involved paying a fee of £30. He seemed aware of UKARA, didn’t know anything about the 2007 VCR regulations and thus didn’t understand the relevance of PLI and then claimed that the SRA’s insurance policy did not exist! That can have consequences; aside from being libel, he’s sought to restrain our lawful trade, which is an offence at common law and crossed the line set in the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. He showed someone’s UKASA certificate on his ‘video’ and with that in front of him – with all our contact details thereon, failed to check anything with us. Then, to cap it off, and with our letterhead detailing our website in front of him, he put up a home page from the obsolete website that hasn’t been updated since Peter Brookesmith retired two years ago. More than 3,000 checks were successfully carried out by event organisers this year, made as SRA groups produced their PLI credentials to event organisers and English Heritage venues up and down the country, so the apparent fact that one idiot can’t manage something so simple says quite a lot about him, his methodology and the low standards of his research. He didn’t ‘get’ that there’s no lower age limit on the SRA’s PLI (after claiming it don’t exist), pointing out the 18-age limit on airsoft purchases. Yeah, right. The SRA was formed as an association for grown-ups with real guns. For a grown-up to teach shotgun shooting to a person under 15 years old, it has to be done on land occupied by the teacher, or at a registered clay-shoot. To let a junior use a shotgun on land where merely permission to do so is held, the junior needs his own shot gun certificate and there’s no lower age limit for that. Put another way, would you want to go shooting with someone who doesn’t have PLI? Seriously? That’s the gap UKASA sought to fill, simultaneously providing both buyer and seller with a defence under the VCR Act and that works with the SRA’s PLI behind them. Same as it is behind more than 500 other clubs and associations, as it has been for more than thirty years and we look forward to the next thirty, and fewer trolls. Can’t say the same about knee-jerk reactions though: there’s another one building at the time of writing. The Home Office thinks rifles chambered .50” BMG and held on firearm certificates should be prohibited and is holding a ‘consultation’ about it.

Categories: None

Post a Comment


Oops, you forgot something.


The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.


Reply off white jordan 1
8:39 PM on January 26, 2021 
I just wanted to type a quick comment to be able to thank you for all of the fabulous secrets you are sharing here. My time consuming internet research has at the end of the day been honored with good quality information to exchange with my company. I 'd repeat that we website visitors are undeniably blessed to be in a great place with many special people with beneficial methods. I feel rather blessed to have encountered your entire web pages and look forward to really more thrilling minutes reading here. Thank you once more for all the details.
off white jordan 1
Reply A Payday Loan
9:57 PM on January 26, 2021 
where can i get a payday loan payday personal loans same day payday loans no credit check payday loans sacramento payday loans chicago bad credit installment loans guaranteed fastcash
Reply paul george shoes
10:44 PM on January 26, 2021 
I together with my guys were actually looking through the excellent advice on your web site while before long I had an awful feeling I had not thanked the web blog owner for those tips. Those young men ended up as a consequence excited to learn them and have now really been having fun with those things. Thanks for indeed being quite helpful and also for utilizing this sort of fantastic ideas most people are really wanting to be informed on. My sincere apologies for not expressing appreciation to you sooner.
paul george shoes
Reply lebron james shoes
10:44 PM on January 26, 2021 
I must show appreciation to this writer just for rescuing me from this trouble. Right after exploring throughout the the net and getting opinions that were not helpful, I believed my life was well over. Living devoid of the approaches to the problems you have sorted out by way of your good blog post is a crucial case, as well as the ones that could have adversely damaged my career if I hadn't encountered your web page. The capability and kindness in dealing with all the pieces was important. I am not sure what I would've done if I had not come across such a stuff like this. I can at this moment look forward to my future. Thanks a lot so much for the high quality and amazing help. I will not be reluctant to endorse your web page to anybody who needs and wants support on this subject matter.
lebron james shoes
Reply off white
11:51 PM on January 26, 2021 
I wanted to create you one very small observation to thank you yet again for these breathtaking pointers you have provided in this case. It was really wonderfully generous of people like you to convey unreservedly what exactly many of us could possibly have sold for an e book to generate some money on their own, even more so now that you could possibly have done it in case you desired. Those thoughts as well served to become good way to fully grasp someone else have a similar passion just as mine to understand many more in regard to this matter. Certainly there are thousands of more pleasant opportunities up front for individuals that view your blog.
off white
Reply Loans Online
1:20 AM on January 27, 2021 
payday loan sites
Reply curry shoes
1:50 AM on January 27, 2021 
I am glad for writing to let you understand of the amazing experience my friend's child encountered studying your site. She picked up lots of issues, most notably what it is like to have a very effective helping style to make many more without difficulty fully understand a number of complex things. You really did more than her expectations. I appreciate you for distributing those effective, trusted, edifying and even fun guidance on that topic to Lizeth.
curry shoes
Reply golden goose
2:45 AM on January 27, 2021 
I simply had to appreciate you yet again. I am not sure what I would have followed in the absence of the type of aspects revealed by you relating to such a area of interest. It had become a real challenging condition in my circumstances, however , looking at a well-written fashion you resolved it made me to leap over happiness. I'm thankful for this service as well as sincerely hope you find out what an amazing job you have been accomplishing teaching the rest thru a site. I know that you have never got to know any of us.
golden goose
Reply stephen curry shoes
4:13 AM on January 27, 2021 
I have to get across my admiration for your generosity giving support to men and women who require guidance on in this idea. Your personal commitment to passing the message along appeared to be amazingly informative and has consistently helped people just like me to realize their pursuits. Your new helpful suggestions signifies a whole lot a person like me and somewhat more to my colleagues. Regards; from each one of us.
stephen curry shoes
Reply off white shoes
5:32 AM on January 27, 2021 
I wanted to compose you the little observation in order to thank you very much yet again just for the fantastic secrets you've contributed at this time. This is particularly open-handed with you giving without restraint what exactly many individuals could possibly have distributed for an e book to make some profit for their own end, most notably seeing that you might well have done it in case you wanted. Those secrets in addition acted like a easy way to be sure that other people online have the identical keenness really like mine to find out a good deal more when it comes to this condition. I'm certain there are thousands of more enjoyable instances up front for folks who look over your website.
off white shoes
Reply Pay Day Loan
7:31 AM on January 27, 2021 
bad credit payday loan company short term loans no credit payday loan direct lender for bad credit installment loans no credit check same day loan til payday same day loans fast loans no credit check loans instant approval online
Reply giannis shoes
12:17 PM on January 27, 2021 
I precisely needed to thank you very much all over again. I do not know the things I might have followed without these methods contributed by you over that situation. It seemed to be the hard scenario in my view, nevertheless being able to see the very skilled technique you managed that took me to jump for contentment. I will be thankful for your help as well as pray you recognize what an amazing job you're putting in teaching others all through your blog. I know that you haven't met any of us.
giannis shoes
Reply Kiasef
12:41 PM on January 27, 2021 
furosemide 500
Reply lebron 17 shoes
12:51 PM on January 27, 2021 
My wife and i have been glad Jordan managed to complete his basic research from the ideas he received out of your web site. It is now and again perplexing to simply continually be freely giving strategies that people today could have been selling. And we all understand we've got the blog owner to give thanks to for this. Most of the explanations you have made, the straightforward website navigation, the friendships you give support to promote - it is most fabulous, and it's really aiding our son and the family know that this subject is satisfying, and that is incredibly important. Thanks for all the pieces!
lebron 17 shoes
Reply nike kyrie 7
1:14 PM on January 27, 2021 
I really wanted to make a brief comment in order to thank you for all the remarkable recommendations you are sharing on this website. My extensive internet lookup has now been paid with good suggestions to exchange with my company. I would believe that most of us visitors actually are extremely blessed to be in a fine place with so many lovely individuals with insightful suggestions. I feel somewhat happy to have discovered your website and look forward to tons of more thrilling times reading here. Thank you once again for all the details.
nike kyrie 7
Reply bape
3:08 PM on January 27, 2021 
Thank you a lot for providing individuals with a very memorable opportunity to read critical reviews from this site. It is often very amazing plus jam-packed with fun for me personally and my office colleagues to visit your blog nearly thrice weekly to learn the latest items you have got. And definitely, I'm so usually fascinated with the unbelievable guidelines you give. Certain two areas in this posting are in truth the most effective we have all ever had.
Reply Alansef
3:36 PM on January 27, 2021 
allopurinol 50 mg daily amoxicillin capsules no prescription how to buy viagra pills propranolol oral metformin 750 mg price azithromycin 600 mg india medicine trazodone cheap canadian pharmacy cialis cheap lexapro online synthroid cheapest prices
Reply Densef
3:46 PM on January 27, 2021 
finpecia without prescription purchase wellbutrin sr zyloprim coupon tamoxifen pills price cost of generic viagra in canada
Reply Paulsef
3:52 PM on January 27, 2021 
cheapest viagra online where can i buy prednisolone uk levitra 20 mg bactrim cost phenergan 12.5
Reply nike shox for women
4:00 PM on January 27, 2021 
I would like to point out my affection for your generosity giving support to people that actually need assistance with this concept. Your very own commitment to getting the solution all-around had become extraordinarily valuable and has all the time allowed associates just like me to attain their ambitions. Your new warm and friendly tips and hints means a great deal a person like me and somewhat more to my office colleagues. Many thanks; from everyone of us.
nike shox for women