For shooters and re-enactors, living history demonstrators, air soft players etc. Membership benefits include

the Shooters' Journal, advice line and £10 million VCR compliant PLI as standard for all activities 



What a Troll

Posted on October 16, 2017 at 2:25 PM

Just a Troll On Saturday 7th October a ‘video’ got posted on the Airsoft Nation’s Facebook page in which the SRA rated a defamatory mention. What sparked things off was the launch of a new airsoft association – UKASA – United Kingdom Airsoft Site Association, which the ‘video’ author felt the irrational need to sneer at. The main source of airsoft product appears to be Taiwan. Quality, build, feel and utility have improved immensely in the past two decades since the SRA included ‘airsoft skirmish’ in their public liability insurance policy. Their usage has also broadened: classified these days as ‘Realistic Imitation Firearms’ (RIFs) by the Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006, they are photogenic enough to serve as wall hangers, set decorators, collectors’ items and in living history displays: as projectile launchers in battle re-enactment and in target shooting they feature in both the gallery-style shooting shy one might encounter at a country fair and at target shooting clubs: besides that, they get used by war-gamers in airsoft skirmish and by movie-makers as props. Home Office concerns about the public owning firearms have a long back-story, consisting largely of a series of ignorance-based knee-jerk reactions to unrelated events. Back in the 1960s, the Wilson government repealed the 1870 Gun Licensing Act, that being a tax costing more to collect than it raised. Gun owners were supposed to buy one unless they had a firearm certificate or a game licence: so clay pigeon shooters needed it and air gun owners were supposed to acquire them after Moore v Gooderham (1960) decided that low-powered air guns were firearms and not toys, as earlier held in Bryson v Gamage Ltd (1907) In the course of making that decision, plans were drawn up to introduce a shot gun certificate, that they then shelved as not worth the bother, in 1965. On 12th August 1966 three Metropolitan policemen were shot dead and the media hue and cry was for the restoration of the death penalty: suspended for an experimental five-year period the year before. The names of the murderers who escaped the rope because of that temporary (later permanent) reprieve became famous: Ronald and Reginald Kray, Myra Hindley, Ian Brady and Harry Roberts. Had they hanged, they would be as nameless and faceless as the last two men hanged in Britain in 1964. Home Secretary of the day Roy Jenkins headed off the media storm by cracking down on shotguns: the usual knee-jerk diversionary tactic that this saga will encounter again and again. The police murderers had used handguns; shotguns only featured in poaching cases, domestic homicides and suicides, and as swag in burglaries, but on the ‘do something’ mantra that politicians live day-to-day by, it was handily still near the top of the litter bin. And that would have been that, except the Home Office gave the job of issuing the certificates to the police, instead of to the Post Office that had previously issued gun licenses. Some 600,000 people applied in 1968, causing another knee-jerk reaction: this time by (Sir) John McKay, chief inspector of constabularies. He went into a frightful funk at the thought of so many people, particularly in cities, having guns, little realizing that only one in four (SRA’s estimate) of owners actually bothered applying. The police didn’t know the extent of gun ownership in the UK because it wasn’t a problem and thus wasn’t on their radar. Nevertheless, the urge to ‘do something’ was all powerful, so McKay formed a committee of his cronies and they concluded that reducing the number of firearms in the hands of the public was a desirable aim in itself. So a committee without a question to answer reached its conclusions first and then looked for ‘how’ to achieve their goal rather than letting the evidence show them the way forwards. McKay’s report was so embarrassing that it has never been published. It formed the background to a green paper in 1973 that was flushed into oblivion, along with Sir Edward Heath’s conservative government in 1974, only to re-appear as the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1988. Another knee-jerk reaction to events: in this instance the issue of a firearm certificate to an unsuitable person by a police force just going through the motions. This legislation banned semi-automatic centre-fire rifles and legitimized deactivation, thus setting the scene for subsequent knee-jerk reactions. The Home Office didn’t notice, of course. They’d swallowed the police line that reducing the number of certificates was the solution whatever the problem was thought to be and banning some guns by type should supposedly have a reducing impact on certificate numbers. The ‘increase’ in shot gun certificate numbers 1968-88 certainly reflects the increasing wealth and leisure time of the population, but was also undoubtedly driven by late take-up of the requirement by owners. It took the farming community a long time to ‘get’ that the requirement was one each (like birth certificates) as opposed to one per farm, as was the case with poisons, explosives and other such licenses as may be necessary for a working farm to work. After 1988, numbers dwindled, but that’s carborundum policing rather than the public changing its attitudes. The main effect was far more guns outside the control system than within it. Deactivation took tens of thousands of guns out of registration and since demand could not be satisfied within the licensing system, people looked to guns that didn’t have anything to do with licensing instead. Entries to the market included paintball guns, airsoft and air cartridge revolvers. The handgun ban in 1997, while putting ‘real’ handguns into the prohibited section 5 category, also released from the controls altogether captive bolt humane killers and CO2 pneumatic guns. Policy drew the bottom line power threshold far enough above paintball and airsoft for them not to get onto the Home Office radar. We’ve come a long way since the US Government decided that 59 foot pounds was the minimum for lethality. In the UK today it’s 0.7 ft. lb. In January 2003 a drive-by shooting killed two women in a burst of machine gun fire. Machine guns were prohibited in 1937, so naturally some other scapegoat had to be prohibited in the ‘knee-jerk’ ‘do-something’ world of the Home Office. Air cartridge revolvers got it that time around and three years later, airsoft came to Home Office attention. The Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006 refers to ‘realistic imitation firearms’ (RIFs) while specifically excluding deactivated formerly real guns from the definition. There had previously been public order legislation relating to imitation firearms, but the ‘problem’ was the open sale of RIFs to walk-in custom. A 1994 research paper at the Home Office had found, inter alia, that the armed robbers they interviewed in prison had often made the decision to stage a hold-up because a suitable firearms-look-a-like prop came to hand. Only two of the robbers in that study had real guns and one of them had owned his since the war and had no ammunition. All the others used imitations of one sort or another – this is the old sawn-off cucumber in a brown paper bag trick – or variations of it, and many of them didn’t show a weapon to the victims at all. So the idea was a variation on the US federal five-day waiting period for a handgun. Instead of walk-in impulse buyers being able to make a purchase and then rob next door with it, the Home Office wanted a qualifying threshold that was more than an age bar but short of a licensing system. Airsoft guns were, by then, a specialist subject: ‘real’ gunshops didn’t generally sell them. Air weapon specialist gunshops might have: the only one we were familiar with at the time didn’t and these air gun shops had to register as firearms dealers with the police and keep a register of who they sold air guns to as a result of the VCR Act. The Act lumped airsofts in with any other RIFs – replicas, 1/1 model kits etc. Regulations following the Act in 2007 suggested that public liability insurance would serve as evidence one had a defence under the Act in relation to historic re-enactments. So far as the airsoft side goes, the importers formed UKARA – the United Kingdom Airsoft Retailers Association. Under the Act, airsoft retailers need a defence to a charge of supply. In the case of historical re-enactment, that’s straightforward – the buyer produces evidence of his public liability insurance for that purpose, completes the deal and goes on his way rejoicing. But for airsoft skirmishers, the solution arrived at was registration of players. You attend a game site three times in seven weeks and the organisers register you with UKARA. Then when you turn up at a retailer, he has a defence under the Act for making a sale to you. What you’ve got as you go on your way with your purchase is a realistic imitation firearm in a public place. That has its own problems, all of which are solved by keeping what it is concealed by packaging that also prevents you having access to it in public: ‘securely covered so that it cannot be fired’ as the mantra relating to air guns puts it. There’s no offence of possession per se; the VCR Act and regulations are concerned only with transactions and that sales are limited to authorized buyers. These are persons with PLI for historic re-enactment. The Act and regulations are silent about UKARA registration, as is the Home Office website. As an aside, ‘Airsoft World’ exhibited at ‘War and Peace’ this year and when we trawled through their range of products they couldn’t produce anything that didn’t homage weapons used in past conflicts: so all airsoft skirmish is ‘historic’: sure, you can stage a futuristic scenario for a war game, such as Russians v Germany, but you’ll be doing it with weapons that all served in Afghanistan. So, back to our troll, rambling into an open microphone in a darkened bedroom somewhere in England: his problem seemed to be that joining UKASA involved paying a fee of £30. He seemed aware of UKARA, didn’t know anything about the 2007 VCR regulations and thus didn’t understand the relevance of PLI and then claimed that the SRA’s insurance policy did not exist! That can have consequences; aside from being libel, he’s sought to restrain our lawful trade, which is an offence at common law and crossed the line set in the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. He showed someone’s UKASA certificate on his ‘video’ and with that in front of him – with all our contact details thereon, failed to check anything with us. Then, to cap it off, and with our letterhead detailing our website in front of him, he put up a home page from the obsolete website that hasn’t been updated since Peter Brookesmith retired two years ago. More than 3,000 checks were successfully carried out by event organisers this year, made as SRA groups produced their PLI credentials to event organisers and English Heritage venues up and down the country, so the apparent fact that one idiot can’t manage something so simple says quite a lot about him, his methodology and the low standards of his research. He didn’t ‘get’ that there’s no lower age limit on the SRA’s PLI (after claiming it don’t exist), pointing out the 18-age limit on airsoft purchases. Yeah, right. The SRA was formed as an association for grown-ups with real guns. For a grown-up to teach shotgun shooting to a person under 15 years old, it has to be done on land occupied by the teacher, or at a registered clay-shoot. To let a junior use a shotgun on land where merely permission to do so is held, the junior needs his own shot gun certificate and there’s no lower age limit for that. Put another way, would you want to go shooting with someone who doesn’t have PLI? Seriously? That’s the gap UKASA sought to fill, simultaneously providing both buyer and seller with a defence under the VCR Act and that works with the SRA’s PLI behind them. Same as it is behind more than 500 other clubs and associations, as it has been for more than thirty years and we look forward to the next thirty, and fewer trolls. Can’t say the same about knee-jerk reactions though: there’s another one building at the time of writing. The Home Office thinks rifles chambered .50” BMG and held on firearm certificates should be prohibited and is holding a ‘consultation’ about it.

Categories: None

Post a Comment


Oops, you forgot something.


The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.


Reply Jay
11:30 AM on November 18, 2017 
Sooo you don?t think airsofters are grown ups because they don?t use real guns??
Reply Silvia S. Haywood
5:34 AM on December 15, 2018 
i play paintball.isn't it an airsoft game?
Reply converse outlet store
11:44 PM on August 10, 2020 
I not to mention my buddies have been studying the best information and facts from your site then suddenly developed a horrible feeling I never expressed respect to the website owner for those strategies. The ladies are already for this reason warmed to learn all of them and have now in actuality been tapping into them. I appreciate you for really being very thoughtful and also for choosing such tremendous issues millions of individuals are really desperate to know about. My very own sincere apologies for not saying thanks to earlier.
converse outlet store
Reply balenciaga
3:33 PM on August 13, 2020 
I precisely wished to thank you very much again. I am not sure the things I would've handled without those basics shared by you over such subject. It was an absolute alarming concern for me personally, however , spending time with a well-written mode you processed the issue took me to cry with happiness. Extremely thankful for your support and thus wish you comprehend what a powerful job you are accomplishing teaching the rest with the aid of a web site. Most likely you've never met any of us.
Reply curry 4
8:59 AM on August 14, 2020 
My wife and i were really contented that Ervin could complete his researching from your ideas he received in your web pages. It's not at all simplistic to just be making a gift of concepts that people have been trying to sell. And now we grasp we need you to be grateful to for that. These illustrations you made, the straightforward website menu, the relationships you can give support to engender - it is many extraordinary, and it's leading our son and the family know that the situation is pleasurable, which is certainly rather fundamental. Thank you for everything!
curry 4
Reply supreme clothing
7:51 PM on August 15, 2020 
I truly wanted to write a quick message to say thanks to you for these lovely facts you are sharing at this site. My time-consuming internet investigation has at the end of the day been rewarded with good details to talk about with my partners. I 'd declare that most of us readers are quite endowed to dwell in a notable website with so many wonderful individuals with insightful solutions. I feel quite privileged to have seen your web site and look forward to plenty of more amazing minutes reading here. Thank you once more for everything.
supreme clothing
Reply golden goose sneakers
5:13 AM on August 18, 2020 
I as well as my buddies have been looking through the nice things found on the blog while quickly I got an awful feeling I had not thanked the blog owner for those secrets. The men were absolutely happy to study them and have now surely been loving those things. Appreciate your really being considerably considerate and then for pick out varieties of incredibly good areas millions of individuals are really wanting to learn about. My very own honest apologies for not expressing gratitude to sooner.
golden goose sneakers
Reply golden goose sneakers
7:39 AM on August 19, 2020 
I simply wished to thank you so much once again. I do not know the things that I would have carried out in the absence of the actual aspects shared by you relating to this subject. Completely was an absolute alarming case for me, nevertheless taking a look at a skilled technique you solved the issue made me to weep with happiness. I am just happy for this guidance and as well , believe you are aware of a powerful job you are always accomplishing teaching people today by way of a web site. I am sure you have never met any of us.
golden goose sneakers
Reply yeezy
3:16 PM on August 23, 2020 
I have to express thanks to this writer for rescuing me from such a circumstance. Because of scouting throughout the online world and meeting advice that were not pleasant, I thought my life was over. Being alive without the solutions to the problems you've fixed through your entire guide is a serious case, as well as those that could have in a negative way affected my entire career if I had not encountered the blog. Your primary skills and kindness in maneuvering the whole thing was invaluable. I am not sure what I would've done if I had not come across such a stuff like this. It's possible to now look ahead to my future. Thanks a lot so much for the reliable and amazing guide. I won't think twice to propose your web sites to any individual who needs to have guide about this issue.
Reply kobe byrant shoes
4:15 AM on August 24, 2020 
I actually wanted to jot down a brief word to express gratitude to you for all the wonderful recommendations you are giving here. My long internet search has at the end been honored with incredibly good suggestions to talk about with my close friends. I 'd suppose that most of us website visitors actually are unquestionably endowed to dwell in a notable site with so many special people with valuable tactics. I feel extremely happy to have seen your entire webpage and look forward to plenty of more pleasurable times reading here. Thanks again for a lot of things.
kobe byrant shoes
Reply off white jordan 1
9:11 AM on August 26, 2020 
I'm commenting to let you understand of the useful discovery my girl experienced checking yuor web blog. She discovered a lot of details, most notably what it is like to possess an amazing teaching style to let many people without problems master specific tricky issues. You undoubtedly exceeded readers' desires. Thank you for distributing the effective, trusted, explanatory and in addition easy thoughts on your topic to Mary.
off white jordan 1
Reply air jordans
6:35 PM on August 27, 2020 
I precisely wished to appreciate you again. I do not know the things I could possibly have worked on in the absence of these basics revealed by you about such field. It has been the traumatic difficulty in my position, however , being able to see this skilled style you solved the issue made me to cry with delight. I'm happy for the work as well as hope that you find out what a powerful job your are carrying out instructing people today via your webblog. I'm certain you haven't encountered all of us.
air jordans
Reply cheap jordans
7:54 PM on August 29, 2020 
My spouse and i were now fortunate that John managed to finish up his analysis from the precious recommendations he made through the blog. It is now and again perplexing to simply choose to be making a gift of key points that some people could have been making money from. We really acknowledge we've got the writer to be grateful to for that. The most important explanations you have made, the straightforward blog navigation, the relationships you make it possible to create - it is many wonderful, and it's really leading our son in addition to our family feel that this content is brilliant, which is extraordinarily important. Thank you for the whole lot!
cheap jordans
Reply giannis antetokounmpo shoes
7:25 PM on August 31, 2020 
A lot of thanks for all your valuable effort on this web page. My mother really likes managing investigation and it's really obvious why. My partner and i notice all regarding the compelling manner you give useful thoughts through your website and therefore attract response from some others about this matter while my simple princess is without question being taught a lot. Enjoy the rest of the year. You're doing a useful job.
giannis antetokounmpo shoes
Reply kd 12 shoes
4:55 PM on September 2, 2020 
My wife and i felt so satisfied that Edward managed to do his researching from the ideas he acquired out of the web page. It is now and again perplexing to simply happen to be making a gift of concepts the others may have been trying to sell. And we also fully understand we have the blog owner to be grateful to for this. Those explanations you have made, the easy website menu, the relationships you make it possible to promote - it's many sensational, and it's assisting our son and us believe that that subject is fun, which is especially serious. Thank you for the whole thing!
kd 12 shoes
Reply lebron james shoes
2:45 PM on September 4, 2020 
Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive read something like this before. So good to find someone with some unique ideas on this subject. realy thank you for beginning this up. this website is one thing that is needed on the net, someone with a little originality. helpful job for bringing one thing new to the web!
lebron james shoes
Reply supreme
5:34 PM on September 6, 2020 
This really answered my downside, thanks!
Reply supreme shirt
7:46 PM on September 6, 2020 
Oh my goodness! a tremendous article dude. Thank you Nonetheless I'm experiencing issue with ur rss . Don?t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anybody getting identical rss drawback? Anyone who is aware of kindly respond. Thnkx
supreme shirt
Reply balenciaga
6:25 PM on September 8, 2020 
Would you be considering exchanging links?
Reply pg 4
8:38 PM on September 8, 2020 
You made some respectable points there. I seemed on the web for the problem and located most people will go together with together with your website.
pg 4