For shooters and re-enactors, living history demonstrators, air soft players etc. Membership benefits include

the Shooters' Journal, advice line and £10 million VCR compliant PLI as standard for all activities 



Spree Killers - the role of the weapon in crime

Posted on February 23, 2018 at 4:40 AM

 It’s always fascinating to see how others see us: Rachel Blevins article published on on the 18th February and attached to the SRA’s Facebook page by Edward Beck a few days later is a case in point. The thrust of the article is that the spree killer suspect in a recent Florida school shooting had purchased the AR15 rifle legally and that while his rampage has sparked calls for more gun control, in countries like the UK where such controls already exist, he could have used his legal knife collection for the rampage instead. (We haven’t checked his knife collection against UK law: some types legal in Florida may be prohibited here.) The American gun ‘debate’ is a polarized one in which any literary entrant has to present as ‘pro’ or ‘anti’ and then is only going to be read by the side he or she is writing in support of. Writers who can’t be easily categorised are background-checked and investigated to the enth degree before being dismissed by whichever side disagrees with them. The polarised sides of the debate have to know whether a writer aids their cause or not before bothering to read them. So whether Rachel Blevins is pro, anti or just inquisitive as to the facts may matter to some readers, who will immediately ignore her perspective if she in any way intrudes on their preconceived position. It doesn’t matter to us, because the point she is reaching toward isn’t a gun debate point: it’s an old sociological one. As Shooters’ Rights Association secretary, nobody is likely to assume I’m anti-gun, which means some people who don’t own guns will have stopped reading by now. That said, I used to write on Handgunner Magazine; that had a huge readership among which gun owners were a minority. My writing approach was double-layered. The practical side was always written from experience, but had to be supported by the wider academic background to any subject, so if I were writing about the AR15 rifle in this piece, the history of its development, the teething troubles experienced in Vietnam and the way in which design (and manufacturing material) changes brought about the product we know today is as important to a rounded article as what it’s like to use, its fitness for purpose, its quality and panache. Will it be around in a hundred years time like our centenarian Short Lee Enfield rifles are now and still will be? Personally, I take a libertarian view of what this world has to offer us. As the ‘BREXIT’ debate raged around Westminster and the BBC, I couldn’t help pointing out that the free movement of people and goods between Britain and Europe was all sorted out in the Bronze Age. What our forebears lacked was governments and once they’d caught up with that concept, their problems started and have been passed down to us. The problem with governments is they believe their reason for being is to control the rest of us. Control is a question of give and take: they take taxes off us and then spend that money on things they give us. The Romans used tax money on infrastructure to help the rich grow richer, while they gave the poor free clean water (all those aqueducts), free bread and free entry to stadia to watch chariots races, gladiators fighting or lions eating: so enough about what you can have as a prole in Roman society. Rachel Blevins summarizes Britain (in the context of her article) as 37,443 knife offences (September 2016-17), of which 12,980 took place in London and these numbers are 21% higher than the year before. Four people were stabbed to death in London on 31st December 2017, making 80 for the year. She comments on our strict gun laws and suggests that the Florida spree killer suspect could not have owned his AR15 in the UK before pointing out that despite our laws (actually, because of them) 6,694 gun crimes were recorded in the year September 2016-17. The numbers are a distraction from her point, but as an aside consider a few more numbers. The late Colin Greenwood reckoned on an average 600 murders a year in the UK, of which 50 would be by firearms. Those ballpark numbers have changed so little in my lifetime, despite a 50% increase in population since WW2, that percentage differences between years are worthlessly erratic. The actual numbers though, are low when set against the number of lethal weapon ‘crimes’, so immediately one can see that there is a lot more to ‘gun’ and ‘knife’ crime than murders. The most recent homicide figure available (709) includes 96 people unlawfully killed in 1989 at Hillsborough Stadium in a crowd control failure, so other years will have other anomalies. Murder is a crime at common law, so it’s always been there. Most gun and knife crimes are not murders, so they’ll be violations of statute law. Firearms laws in the UK start in 1870 with a licensing act, followed by firearm certificates in 1920; to which additional categories of prohibited weapons (1937) and shotguns (1968) were added. Since then, various knee-jerk measures have caused unintended consequences that additional knee-jerk measures have been patched onto but fail to address and that process continues to this day. Policing adopted a policy of trying to prevent ‘the public’ having access to firearms in 1972, which in their terms meant reducing the numbers registered. A poor measure, since barely 10% of the UK’s gun stock is registered, but that’s another article. That policy has been aided by the government banning some types and the courts exempted others from certificate controls and the fray continues, such that it’s a reasonable bet that a lot of ‘gun crime’ in the UK is actually people in the registration system failing to get the paperwork right: which means its law-abiding taxpayers in court, such as James Edmiston – respected firearms dealer – whose horrific gun crime was failing to tell the police about shotguns he transferred from his business to his personal certificate. That would account for six of the gun crimes in the year it was recorded as taking place. Knife crime escalates after the Prevention of Crime Act 1953, which created a new category at law of ‘offensive weapons’. Additions have been made to this in 1988 and since, so some knife types are banned (butterfly knives, switchblades etc.) and others are ‘offensive weapons’ when carried in a public place. As with firearms crime, most culprits in the aftermath of the 1988 legislation were law-abiding taxpayers carrying a knife because they always had. One in nine adults had been in the Scout movement (which abolished wearing knives on the uniform in 1966) and most men over fifty had seen military service (conscription ended in 1958) and had a jack knife issued as part of kit. So the crime figures came from stop-and-search of fishermen, electricians and lorry drivers. British knife and crime statistics include all this policing of soft targets; people who didn’t know they were doing anything wrong and certainly hadn’t violated any of the Ten Commandments. But back to Rachel Blevins: her point is that if one way of murdering schoolchildren in bulk is denied to the wannabe spree killer, he’ll adopt another method. Emile Durkheim (French sociologist 1858-1917) established that point in the context of suicides (published in 1897) and his points are transferable to other violence. Would the Syrians have resorted to dropping improvised barrel bombs on schools and hospitals if poison gas was readily available to them? Can North Korea resist the urge to use nuclear weapons now that they have a delivery system for them? British spree killer David Copeland used nail bombs powered by gunpowder from readily available fireworks for his 2002 killings. The AR15 type rifle available to the Florida spree killer is a variant that was banned in the UK in 1989. It seems to be a given point that spree killers use what’s available and thus what’s legal in their jurisdiction at the time, but will have committed some other existing offence prior to the homicides they committed. It’s also a consistently apparent fact that spree killers commit their atrocities where it’s safe (for them) to do so – of which more below. David Copeland’s crime prior to murder was dismantling fireworks, which is illegal in the UK. Both the Hungerford murderer in 1987 and the Dunblane school killer in 1996 violated firearms legislation by taking their guns together with ammunition into a public place without lawful authority or a reasonable excuse prior to killing anybody: so they deliberately violated one law on their way to violating another. What prevents crime in society generally is twofold: one element is that there is sufficient for your needs: your parents don’t deprive you of anything essential and the other is us learning the parameters of social control from our peers and teachers by which we each develop a moral compass. Jesus Christ had that figured when he summarized the law and commandments as love your god with all your heart and love your neighbour as yourself: which sounds fair as a moral compass until one remembers that his criminality attracted the death penalty. Must’ve been some statute law he crossed. And that happens a lot in the UK, hence our knife and gun crime rates. The Home Office studied the role of firearms in robberies in the 1990s. Their study was limited in scope, but what came out of it was how many armed robbers were (a) predisposed to serious crime beforehand and (b) decided upon the armed robbery for which they were in prison when interviewed as a result of coming across the weapon they used. A couple had real guns and ammunition. The rest had something else (the old sawn-off cucumber in a paper bag trick), a ‘realistic imitation firearm’ or just said they had something. What they all had in common (apart from the WW2 veteran who was trying to make a point) was that the ‘remote control’ of a firearm in the furtherance of gaining cash prevented violence both by and toward victims. Following the four knife murders in London on 31st December, the Metropolitan police wanted help with tackling the menace – as they saw it – of people carrying knives in public. These are mostly carried, according to them, for defence. The obvious problem with carrying a lethal contact weapon for defence is what can you do with it to defend yourself? That predicament for Londoners has a long backstory, but in summary, knives are easy and legal to access, while all the obvious non-lethal options for encouraging others to mind their own business have been banned in the UK: more accurately, they are ‘police only’. Stun guns, Taser, kobutans and truncheons are all prohibited to the public in public: so following the time-honoured ‘solution’ to that problem, as articulated by Emile Durkheim in 1897, ‘the public’ move on to what is available. This is a separate debate point from the wider one of why one might need a weapon for self-defence while out in public at all. Not an easy one to answer, but historically, Brits who could afford it have always done so. Before the handgun ban in 1997, Birmingham auction house Weller and Dufty was the gun trade’s second-hand engine room at which civilian pocket pistols and revolvers were a common sight. Pocket bulldogs in .45”, continental revolver in .320”, pinfire and rimfire vied with post-nitro .25ACP pocket pistols for small bids. Pre-WW1, carrying firearms was as common in the UK as it is in westerns, except traditionally Brits carried concealed. Wearing a sword fell out of convenience as coach travel was made easier by George III’s road building programme. Gentlemen switched to overcoat pocket pistols, hence the large patch pockets on topcoats. In 1909, some Eastern European types tried robbing a factory payroll in Tottenham and got chased to Chingford by police who borrowed guns from passers by – some of whom joined in the hue and cry. At the time, police optionally carried concealed revolvers on night duty, so they were armed as Jack the Ripper prowled Whitechapel in 1888, while his victims were not: too poor for that, they could only rely on the forces of law and order to defend them. In principle, being armed for defence is a critical mass issue, the same as inoculations: for the latter to work, a large enough proportion of the population has had to have the jab so the disease can’t readily jump from one host to another. In the case of self-defence, the more people prepared, the less likely the need to use it. An armed society is a polite society and courtesy of Massad F Ayoob, I worked with police in New Hampshire, where half the adult population had concealed carry permits. One accidental suicide, one attempted suicide and an M1911 in an out-of-town drug dealer’s car was it. The teenage gang fight involved non-lethal weapons. Provocation by skinheads led a yuppie to produce a stun gun, whereupon someone lumped him with a 13-ounce drinks can and his mate added pepper spray to the mix. Everyone went home – eventually. Yet in the UK, our government’s policy has been aimed precisely at criminalising preparedness: disparaged as “on the off-chance of being attacked”, it’s what everybody did quite naturally from 55BC at least until a government official in the 1950s felt the need to ‘do something’ and the result is that avoiding becoming a victim is now as judicially dangerous as being the attacker. British policing has been trying, for some decades now, to take responsibility for public safety upon themselves: i.e. by not recognising the public common law right to defence, while at the same time not accepting responsibility for their failures to provide that protection. So the solution to being a potential victim is preparedness, which is what Donald Trump was thinking of when he spoke of arming teachers; he also made the point immediately that they would be properly trained – a sentiment we endorse in the certain knowledge that an example of an untrained person with a gun is Oscar Pistorius. It is common ground that spree killers attack soft targets – where they wont get hurt by return fire. We are not aware of a single example of a spree killer breaking this rule, which suggests that Donald Trump’s lateral thinking is pointing the right way. Spree killers attack in gun free zones: we thought about this when a British soldier – Lee Rigby – was run down and then hacked to death by a couple of halfwits in 2013. The aerial shot of the crime scene showed a lorry had stopped behind the crime car: now if the lorry driver had been armed, the outcome might have been different and a lesson handed to wannabe terrorists not to mess with Britain: but instead we have a deer stalker in prison because the blocks on four of his licensed revolver chambers were deemed ineffective and a movie armourer is in prison because one of his blank firing weapons supposedly passed through the prohibited weapons classification between being an inert replica and becoming a blank firer. The police are making it very clear to the public that its too dangerous to get involved with firearms; for however hard you try to be legal, they’ll find a way of getting you into court, as with James Edmiston, and that’s the message behind the UK’s gun crime figures.

Categories: None

Post a Comment


Oops, you forgot something.


The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.


Reply curry shoes
6:15 AM on January 22, 2021 
I just wanted to send a small word to thank you for all the remarkable techniques you are posting at this site. My rather long internet research has finally been paid with good quality suggestions to write about with my close friends. I 'd say that most of us visitors are truly blessed to live in a magnificent site with so many marvellous people with useful ideas. I feel truly happy to have seen your website page and look forward to tons of more thrilling minutes reading here. Thank you once more for a lot of things.
curry shoes
Reply curry shoes
9:28 AM on January 25, 2021 
I'm also commenting to let you understand what a amazing experience my wife's princess went through browsing yuor web blog. She came to find many pieces, which include what it is like to possess an ideal helping nature to make the others with no trouble thoroughly grasp a number of complex topics. You really did more than readers' expected results. Many thanks for giving such interesting, dependable, educational as well as fun tips on the topic to Janet.
curry shoes
Reply golden goose sneakers
11:23 AM on January 25, 2021 
I enjoy you because of your whole hard work on this web page. My aunt enjoys engaging in research and it's really easy to see why. We all notice all regarding the compelling method you give insightful guides by means of your web site and invigorate participation from some other people on that area of interest then our own child has been studying a lot of things. Take pleasure in the remaining portion of the year. You are always doing a superb job.
golden goose sneakers
Reply Loan Cash
12:56 PM on January 25, 2021 
cash loans for bad credit
Reply curry shoes
1:28 PM on January 25, 2021 
I must show my appreciation to the writer for rescuing me from such a trouble. Because of browsing through the online world and meeting concepts that were not helpful, I figured my entire life was well over. Existing without the answers to the issues you've fixed all through the article is a serious case, as well as those which might have adversely affected my career if I had not come across the blog. The talents and kindness in taking care of a lot of stuff was helpful. I am not sure what I would've done if I hadn't come upon such a stuff like this. I can at this point relish my future. Thank you very much for your high quality and amazing guide. I won't be reluctant to propose the sites to anyone who needs to have care about this area.
curry shoes
Reply Loans Online
1:58 PM on January 25, 2021 
online loans bad credit direct lender installment loans direct lender payday loans payday loans for unemployed internet loans personal loan lenders
Reply Money Loan
2:01 PM on January 25, 2021 
payday lender cash advance loans best payday loans online usa payday loans best payday loans badcreditloans compare loan rates payday loans chicago
Reply Paulsef
4:55 PM on January 25, 2021 
viagra 12.5 mg clomid 50mg price uk lasix tablet price in india best generic retin a viagra online sales
Reply Online Loans
5:51 PM on January 25, 2021 
specialized loan services
Reply yeezy boost 350 v2
6:21 PM on January 25, 2021 
I intended to put you this little observation to be able to give thanks as before just for the magnificent concepts you have shown on this website. This is shockingly open-handed of you giving openly precisely what a few individuals might have offered as an electronic book to end up making some profit for themselves, even more so considering that you might well have tried it if you ever decided. The secrets in addition served to be a great way to fully grasp that some people have a similar passion much like my very own to learn more with regards to this issue. I am sure there are lots of more fun occasions in the future for individuals who read through your site.
yeezy boost 350 v2
Reply jordans
7:35 PM on January 25, 2021 
I wanted to write a small note so as to say thanks to you for the fantastic facts you are placing on this website. My time consuming internet search has finally been compensated with extremely good knowledge to share with my relatives. I would declare that many of us website visitors are definitely fortunate to exist in a great network with very many marvellous people with useful points. I feel somewhat blessed to have discovered your web page and look forward to plenty of more thrilling moments reading here. Thank you again for all the details.
Reply yeezy boost 350 v2
8:29 PM on January 25, 2021 
I as well as my guys have been studying the great key points from your web page then then I got a terrible feeling I never thanked the web site owner for those tips. All the boys were consequently glad to see them and now have clearly been taking advantage of these things. I appreciate you for genuinely so thoughtful and for picking out some high-quality subjects most people are really needing to understand about. Our honest regret for not expressing appreciation to you earlier.
yeezy boost 350 v2
Reply paul george shoes
8:33 PM on January 25, 2021 
I needed to post you that bit of observation so as to say thanks a lot over again with your unique suggestions you have shared on this site. This has been quite extremely open-handed with you to make unhampered all a number of people would have distributed for an e-book to make some bucks for their own end, primarily given that you could have done it if you ever wanted. These tricks likewise served to become a great way to recognize that other people have similar dreams similar to my very own to know the truth good deal more with respect to this condition. I know there are lots of more pleasant opportunities up front for many who read through your blog.
paul george shoes
Reply Carlsef
8:47 PM on January 25, 2021 
generic viagra us how can i get allopurinol without a prescription doxycycline where to get generic propecia online pharmacy retin a 0.05 cream coupon
Reply pandora charms
8:48 PM on January 25, 2021 
I definitely wanted to post a simple note so as to express gratitude to you for some of the nice ideas you are placing on this website. My prolonged internet investigation has now been honored with extremely good information to talk about with my family. I 'd point out that many of us site visitors actually are truly lucky to exist in a remarkable place with many perfect people with very helpful opinions. I feel pretty lucky to have encountered your entire web page and look forward to so many more fabulous moments reading here. Thanks a lot once again for everything.
pandora charms
Reply canada goose jacket
10:55 PM on January 25, 2021 
I and also my buddies appeared to be looking at the great information found on your website then suddenly I had an awful feeling I had not thanked the web site owner for those strategies. The boys came warmed to read all of them and have in effect honestly been taking advantage of those things. We appreciate you simply being quite thoughtful as well as for deciding on this sort of magnificent information most people are really eager to understand about. My personal sincere regret for not expressing appreciation to you earlier.
canada goose jacket
Reply yeezy shoes
12:10 AM on January 26, 2021 
I enjoy you because of all of your work on this website. My mom enjoys getting into internet research and it's really easy to see why. I learn all about the compelling manner you create valuable secrets through your web site and strongly encourage response from visitors about this content so our daughter has always been starting to learn a lot. Enjoy the rest of the new year. You have been performing a wonderful job.
yeezy shoes
Reply lebron james shoes
12:15 AM on January 26, 2021 
Needed to send you that tiny note to be able to give thanks over again for these wonderful basics you've contributed on this site. It is so wonderfully open-handed of people like you to give unreservedly what exactly some people would have sold as an e book to generate some bucks for themselves, and in particular given that you might have done it in the event you desired. These good ideas additionally acted as the good way to be aware that many people have the identical eagerness just like my very own to figure out more and more when it comes to this matter. I know there are numerous more fun situations ahead for individuals who look into your site.
lebron james shoes
Reply off white nike
12:45 AM on January 26, 2021 
My spouse and i got so thankful Emmanuel managed to carry out his analysis with the precious recommendations he received from your weblog. It's not at all simplistic to just find yourself making a gift of guides which usually men and women could have been trying to sell. Therefore we already know we have the blog owner to thank for that. The most important explanations you've made, the simple web site navigation, the friendships your site aid to promote - it is everything impressive, and it is letting our son and us do think that topic is excellent, which is unbelievably mandatory. Many thanks for the whole lot!
off white nike
Reply pg 1
12:45 AM on January 26, 2021 
Needed to put you the very little remark to thank you as before for those gorgeous strategies you have shared on this website. It is surprisingly open-handed with you to convey extensively what most of us would have made available for an electronic book to generate some cash on their own, and in particular given that you could possibly have done it in the event you decided. These principles additionally served to become great way to recognize that other people have the same dream really like my very own to see way more regarding this issue. I know there are many more pleasant instances up front for those who view your blog.
pg 1